Home About Services Strategies Markets Performance Team Careers Contact Login

MARKET OUTLOOK · RESEARCH · RISK MONITORING

Decode the Markets: Our Current Outlook

We publish our market views because vestors deserve to know what their portfolio manager is thinking — and why. This is the same document our clients receive through the Open Book portal.

Updated quarterly. Written for clients. Shared with everyone.

Where We Stand: Q1 2026

Every quarter, our investment committee publishes its market outlook. This is the unedited version — the same document our clients receive. No marketing filter. No selective presentation of the data that makes us look prescient. If we're uncertain about something, you'll read the word "uncertain."

Where We Stand: Q1 2026

Canadian Equities

The TSX Composite enters 2026 with a forward P/E of approximately 14.5x, a modest discount to its 10-year average of 15.8x. Earnings growth expectations for the index sit near 7% for the calendar year, driven primarily by financials and energy — although we view the energy earnings estimates as optimistic given current WCS differential levels and pipeline capacity constraints that continue to weigh on Canadian producers.

Energy and financials — which together comprise roughly 50% of the index — face divergent paths. Canadian banks are well-capitalized with CET1 ratios comfortably above regulatory minimums, and we expect dividend growth in the 4–6% range for the Big Five. Energy, by contrast, remains hostage to global supply decisions largely outside Canadian control. We're selectively positioned in high-quality Canadian industrials and dividend growers while underweighting the overconcentration risk that plagues most domestic portfolios. Our Balanced Growth strategy currently holds 28% in Canadian equities versus the 35–40% weighting typical of competitor balanced mandates.

Small and mid-cap Canadian equities, often overlooked by larger managers, offer pockets of genuine value. Companies with strong balance sheets, pricing power, and domestic revenue streams trade at meaningful discounts to their larger peers. Priya Chandrasekaran's bottom-up research has identified several names in the industrial and technology segments that meet our quality screens — these are detailed in client research notes available through the client portal.

Fixed Income

With the Bank of Canada's overnight rate stabilizing after a cumulative 175 basis points of cuts from the 2024 peak, the yield curve has normalized after a prolonged inversion that lasted roughly 18 months. The front end of the curve now yields approximately 3.25%, while the 10-year Government of Canada bond sits near 3.50% — a positive slope that rewards duration for the first time since mid-2023.

We've extended duration modestly in high-quality portfolios, moving from an average duration of 4.2 years to approximately 5.5 years across our Conservative Income strategy. We continue to favour provincial bonds (particularly Ontario and British Columbia issues) and investment-grade corporate bonds rated BBB+ or higher over Government of Canada issues. The additional spread — currently 85–120 basis points for investment-grade corporates — compensates well for the minimal incremental credit risk in a stable-to-improving economic environment.

One area where we've reduced exposure: high-yield credit. Spreads have compressed to levels that no longer adequately compensate for default risk. At current spreads of roughly 300 basis points over Government of Canada benchmarks, we believe the risk-reward has deteriorated. We'd rather own high-quality corporates with predictable cash flows than reach for yield in an asset class where the downside can be severe and sudden.

Global Equities

U.S. large-cap valuations remain elevated by historical standards, with the S&P 500 trading at roughly 21x forward earnings versus a 25-year average of 16.5x. Concentration risk within the index has intensified — the top ten holdings now represent over 35% of the index's total market capitalization, a level that historically precedes periods of underperformance for cap-weighted strategies relative to equal-weighted alternatives.

International developed markets (EAFE) offer a more attractive entry point at approximately 13.5x forward earnings, with European banks and Japanese industrials presenting specific opportunities. Emerging markets remain a smaller tactical allocation — we see value in select Asian economies with favourable demographics and improving governance, but size the position to reflect the higher political and currency risk.

We maintain global diversification as a structural allocation, not a tactical bet — it reduces correlation with domestic real estate holdings (a common issue for our corporate and high-net-worth clients who often have significant property exposure in Ottawa and the GTA) and provides currency diversification that acts as a natural hedge when the Canadian dollar weakens during global risk-off events. For a deeper look at how we implement global exposure across different risk profiles, see our investment strategies page.

Alternative Assets and Real Assets

For clients whose Investment Policy Statements permit alternative allocations — primarily our corporate and institutional mandates — we maintain modest exposure to infrastructure and real asset strategies. These positions serve a specific purpose: they provide inflation sensitivity and income streams that are less correlated with traditional equity and bond markets. We do not use hedge funds, private equity fund-of-funds, or any structure where we cannot independently verify the underlying holdings and fees. Transparency doesn't stop at the portfolio's edge.

Risk Factors We're Watching

Three things keep us honest — and keep us from becoming overconfident in any single market scenario:

(1) Canadian household debt. Debt-to-disposable-income ratios remain above 180%, among the highest in the G7. Variable-rate mortgage renewals at higher rates continue to pressure consumer spending. A meaningful housing correction — even a 15–20% decline in overheated markets — would ripple through bank earnings, consumer confidence, and domestic GDP. We model this scenario quarterly for every client portfolio.

(2) Geopolitical trade disruption. Canadian exports remain heavily concentrated toward the United States, and protectionist rhetoric in Washington has not abated. Tariff escalation or border disruption affecting the automotive, lumber, or energy sectors would disproportionately impact the TSX. We stress-test portfolios against a scenario where Canadian exports to the U.S. decline 12–15% over a 12-month period.

(3) Commercial real estate repricing. Office vacancy rates in major Canadian cities remain elevated, and capitalization rate expansion has not yet fully reflected the higher interest rate environment. This is directly relevant for clients with direct property exposure, pension funds with real estate allocations, and anyone holding Canadian REIT positions. Our corporate surplus management service specifically addresses how to hedge this exposure within a broader portfolio.

None of these are predictions. They're scenarios we model portfolios against every quarter, using historical drawdown data and Monte Carlo simulations. If you'd like to see how your portfolio performs under each of these stress cases, that's a conversation we're happy to have — reach out to schedule a review.

Stress-Test Your Assumptions: Lessons from Past Cycles

Wondering how your portfolio would handle a genuine crisis? We stress-test every client portfolio against these four historical scenarios before investing a single dollar. Since 2006, this practice has shaped every allocation decision we've made — and it's caught vulnerabilities that standard risk questionnaires routinely miss. These aren't abstract exercises — they're the reality checks that separate durable portfolios from fragile ones.

1973–74

The Oil Shock

S&P 500 fell 48%. Inflation spiked to 12%. A simultaneous equity and purchasing-power crisis that destroyed balanced portfolios relying on bonds-as-safe-haven assumptions. The Nifty Fifty — the era's equivalent of today's mega-cap tech darlings — fell from P/E ratios of 50–90x to single digits. Investors who believed diversification meant holding "good companies" learned that valuation discipline matters more than brand recognition.

Why we test against it: It reveals how portfolios behave when both stocks and real bond returns collapse together — the exact scenario most "balanced" portfolios are not designed to survive.

2000–02

The Dot-Com Bust

NASDAQ fell 78% peak to trough. Growth stocks were toxic for a decade. The TSX held up better — but Canadian investors with U.S. growth tilts were devastated, and the Canadian dollar's weakness amplified losses for unhedged portfolios. Companies with no earnings, no revenue, and in some cases no product were trading at billion-dollar valuations. Sound familiar? We think the parallels to certain segments of today's AI-driven market are worth examining carefully.

Why we test against it: It exposes concentration risk, the danger of chasing recent performance, and what happens when a narrative-driven market reverts to fundamental valuation.

2008–09

The Global Financial Crisis

TSX fell 50%. Credit markets froze. Interbank lending seized. Clients with leveraged positions, structured products, or illiquid holdings found out too late that their "diversified" portfolios were, in reality, a single correlated bet on credit expansion. Investment-grade corporate bonds briefly traded at yields that priced in Depression-era default rates. Investors who could stay invested and rebalance captured a generational buying opportunity. Most couldn't — because their portfolios weren't built for it.

Why we test against it: It tests liquidity, credit quality, the cascading failure of correlated assets, and whether a portfolio can survive margin calls and forced selling.

2020

The COVID Crash

Markets fell 34% in 23 trading days — then recovered in five months, the fastest bear-market-to-bull-market cycle in recorded history. A test of temperament, not analysis. Clients who sold at the bottom locked in permanent losses; those who rebalanced into the decline captured the recovery in full. At Burnabilly, we published real-time portfolio updates and held emergency client calls during the third week of March 2020 — not to predict the bottom, but to remind clients what their portfolios were built to withstand.

Why we test against it: It reveals whether a client's stated risk tolerance matches their actual behaviour under extreme pressure — and whether the advisor relationship is strong enough to prevent panic-driven decisions.

Want to see how these scenarios apply to the specific strategy we'd recommend for your situation? Our performance page shows how our actual portfolios behaved during the most recent of these crises.

How We Translate Outlook into Action

A market outlook is only useful if it changes what you actually do. Here's how ours works in practice — and why we believe the process matters at least as much as the conclusions.

Our investment committee meets every Wednesday morning at 8:30 AM. Every meeting produces a one-page summary — the position changes we're making, the rationale behind each change, the size of the adjustment, and the risk factors that could prove us wrong. These summaries are available to clients through the Open Book portal within 24 hours of each meeting. Over the past twelve months, we've published 52 consecutive weekly summaries without missing a single week.

Does your current advisor publish their weekly thinking? We've found that most don't. The question worth asking is: why not? If a firm's investment process is rigorous enough to manage your life savings, it should be rigorous enough to document and share. Transparency isn't a marketing strategy for us — it's an accountability mechanism that forces clearer thinking.

How We Translate Outlook into Action

We're a small team — six people, $340 million under management. That means our investment committee includes everyone who touches your money: Marc and Lily Burnaby bring portfolio construction and macro strategy, Derek Fonseca contributes fixed-income expertise and risk modelling, and Priya Chandrasekaran leads equity research and security selection. All four have a vote on every position change. Saoirse Doherty attends every meeting for compliance perspective — she ensures every decision passes regulatory muster before it's executed. Jean-Luc Garnier brings the client-facing view, flagging real-world constraints like upcoming tax events, cash flow needs, or changing client circumstances that should influence timing. No decision gets made in isolation, and no single person's conviction can override the group's analysis.

The result is a market view that accounts for macro positioning, individual security analysis, client-specific constraints, tax implications, and regulatory requirements — all in one room, every week. When we say we're a fiduciary, this is what it looks like in practice: a process designed so that every decision can withstand scrutiny from every angle before your capital is deployed.

This integrated approach is also why our service offerings are structured the way they are — because the team that writes the market outlook is the same team that manages your portfolio. There are no layers between the research and the execution.

Sharpen Your Perspective: From Our Research Desk

We write about what we're thinking, what we got wrong, and what we'd want to read if we were sitting on the other side of the table. Every article is reviewed by at least two team members before publication — not for marketing polish, but for intellectual honesty.

Investment Post-Mortems

We Lost $220,000 on Bausch Health. Here's What Happened.

November 12, 2025

A full post-mortem on a position that went wrong — from original thesis to the signals we missed to the exact date we exited. The same documentation we share with clients, shared with everyone. Derek Fonseca and Priya Chandrasekaran wrote this one together because they disagreed on the initial thesis, and that disagreement is part of the story.

Process & Methodology

The Exact Steps We Follow Before Buying a Single Stock

October 3, 2025

A walkthrough of our security selection process from initial screen through Priya's valuation model to investment committee vote. Includes a redacted research note so you can see exactly what our internal analysis looks like. If you're evaluating whether to work with us, this is the article that shows you what you're buying.

Fee Transparency

What Your Advisor Won't Show You: A Line-by-Line Fee Breakdown

September 18, 2025

A hypothetical $1M portfolio in typical Canadian mutual funds, with every layer of cost calculated — MERs, trading costs, trailing commissions, fund-of-fund fees, and the hidden drag of cash holdings. Includes a downloadable spreadsheet so you can plug in your own numbers. Spoiler: the total cost is usually 40–60% higher than what appears on your statement. Our fee audit service quantifies this for your specific situation.

Retirement Planning

Retiring Into a Bear Market: Stress-Testing Drawdown Plans Against History's Worst Decades

August 7, 2025

Why "average annual return" is a misleading number for retirees and how sequence-of-returns risk can deplete a portfolio years ahead of schedule. We run actual simulations using the four historical scenarios described above, applied to a $1.5M portfolio withdrawing $60,000 per year. The results are sobering — and they explain why our Conservative Income strategy is built the way it is.

Retirement Planning

Why "Average Returns" Are a Dangerous Fiction for Anyone Over 55

July 22, 2025

Your portfolio doesn't earn averages. It earns a specific sequence of returns, and the order matters enormously. We run the math on what that means for real withdrawal plans, comparing two identical 7%-average-return scenarios that produce wildly different outcomes depending on when the bad years hit. This is the single most important concept in retirement planning, and most advisors skip right past it.

Want to Know How Your Portfolio Would Have Performed in These Scenarios?

We'll apply historical stress tests to your actual holdings — not hypothetical models, not industry averages, but your specific portfolio with its actual positions, weightings, and correlations. The output is a detailed document showing drawdown estimates, recovery timelines, and income disruption risk under each of the four scenarios above. You keep it regardless of what you decide about working with us.

This is part of our complimentary portfolio review. No obligation, no pitch deck, no follow-up calls you didn't ask for. Just the math, clearly presented. Call us at (807) 876-1862 or use the form below.

Request a Stress Test Explore Our Services

Important Disclosures

Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investment returns referenced on this website are historical and do not guarantee future performance.

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The value of your investments can go down as well as up, and you may receive less than you originally invested.

Burnabilly Investments Inc. is registered as a Portfolio Manager and Investment Fund Manager with the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) under National Instrument 31-103. Registration No. PM-2006-0847. Investment Fund Manager Registration No. IFM-2009-1203.

Client assets are held at a qualified third-party custodian (CIBC Mellon) and are covered by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF) up to $1 million per account category.

The information on this website or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Please consult your Investment Policy Statement and speak with your portfolio manager before making investment decisions.